The Build vs Buy
debate is changing again. Companies that serve the M&E Industry should take
note. blog.mindrocketnow.com
February is a bit late to make predictions for the year,
even if it still feels like the year has only just started. Instead, this year
I thought I’d write about advances I’d like to see in the industry. These will
probably arrive later than 2014, but I think they’re necessary, and sooner
rather than later. In this entry, I look at a familiar debate, dressed a little
differently.
Commoditising and
Specialising
There won’t be more money to spend this year than last. The
reality is that the economy as a whole, though growing once more, is still
fragile. So money, especially Capex, needs to be carefully husbanded. This is
necessitating trying to buy as “off-the-shelf” as possible. And if the solution
isn’t available off-the-shelf, the larger buyers are starting to force
commoditisation to make it off-the-shelf.
What is currently specialist will be tomorrow’s commodity,
and tomorrow will also bring a new specialism. The infrastructure of today’s
media business is often blighted from specialism: from hardware, software, even
the cables in today’s head end are specialist. However, better integration is
bringing “In A Box” solutions to the market. Channel IAB, OTT IAB, Post IAB are
all coming soon, or already here. And best of all, it doesn’t matter where the
box is, so no need to own expensive data centres, just expensive data pipes.
Big data and analytics is a new capability that media
companies are starting to learn to harness. Today, you need to hire an
expensive System Integrator with a specialist analytics department to build and
manage your analytics solution, but this too is ripe for commoditisation.
Tomorrow, you should be able to upload your feeds, and get an analytics
solution back. Because the smarts aren’t in the machine that takes inputs to
outputs. What needs to be kept in-house because it truly provides a market
differentiator, is the understanding of which conclusions are needed by the
business, and how to prove them with the data going in. Future Business
Analysts need to be Data Scientists too. Commoditise what doesn’t
differentiate.
The bonus feature of forcing commoditisation, is that it
lowers barrier to providing a product. More vendors = more competition = higher
quality and lower price (at least lower Capex, if not Opex). What’s not to
like?
Well, this is the nub of the old build versus buy debate
that is always going on. We can make the hoary old assumption that if you buy
something, it’ll do 80% of what you want to do. So what happens with the
remaining 20%? The options haven’t changed over time: you either customise the
solution to do the remaining 20% (in which case you go from buy to build); or
you get the organisation to do the remaining 20% (and pay the cost of getting
the business to behave differently); or you forget about the last 20% (and hope
that it isn’t the key to your competitive advantage). Forcing commoditisation
is a way of forcing that 80% to 90%, but it doesn’t make the debate go away.
No comments:
Post a Comment
It's always great to hear what you think. Please leave a comment, and start a conversation!